We don’t have “hall monitors” walking around our offices checking for fires. It’s something all persons of the organization have a watch out for (in large part, because of personal safety). Well, if your company goes bankrupt because all its IP has been stolen, I think that impacts your personal safety. So, start a program of being “security smart” within your organization.
Back in September, I wrote a piece that questioned whether or not you trust your network. As an extension to that piece, this piece focuses on your cyber supply chain.
Let’s begin with this simple premise: you may never fully know who is a part of your cyber supply chain. Why do I say that? It is because it is exactly impossible for you to have a watchful eye on all parts of the supply chain. It would be a full time job for you. In my view, the only entity that could have full control of their cyber supply chain is a government (emphasis on could because even for a government full control of the cyber supply chain could be an incredibly difficult and expensive proposition).
If you accept that simple premise, then by extension, you will have no problem accepting this one as well: the probability of you being breached is greater than zero.
If you are with me so far, this is excellent. It means you have not bought a bag of magical beans from vendors or consultants who are already preaching to you that you are on the way to the cyber secure promised land. Continue reading “Controlling Your Cyber Supply Chain”
Therefore, you are faced with a situation where you not only have to protect your information but also ensure a third-party is protecting your information. By no means is this an easy task. And if you cannot do that, you need to ensure that you are equipped with the necessary tools to protect against what we’ve been calling “potentially unwanted leaks” (PUL).
In our previous article, we laid the groundwork for what we believe to be a serious threat to ICS/SCADA devices: social engineering. We continue here with some definitions, some of which you may already know.
Phishing is a relatively broad term for any attempt to trick victims into sharing sensitive information, such as passwords, usernames and credit card details. The intent is almost always malicious. Another characteristic of phishing is that it tends to be random, usually exploratory in nature, as opposed to a targeted act. Instead of targeting a specific individual or group of individuals, phishing tends to target multiple victims from within the same organization. Think of phishing as the “throwing spaghetti on the wall and whatever sticks” approach. Continue reading “Potentially Unwanted Leaks: Social Engineering, Small Missteps, and Big Mistakes”
We cannot allow this slow economic bleed of our economy to continue. It slows down and even reverses living standards. We simply cannot invest billions into research and development and have it siphoned from us with a few clicks. There is no justifiable reason to let this happen anymore. Smart and competent people have been sounding the alarm bells for some time, but they need more voices to back them.
Expectedly, our cybersecurity issues are growing. We say expectedly for a variety of factors including, but not limited to: size and scope of breaches, increasing costs that cannot be accurately estimated or predicted, a proliferation of technologies and abilities, and geopolitical tensions. Given current conditions, we do not see a particularly bright future if our current cybersecurity strategy remains more or less constant.
What is our current strategy? In short, it is the accumulation of a lot of expensive toys to hold together decaying infrastructure, along with a healthy dose of the putting aside or worse, ignoring, the basics. In short, we look to more technological solutions, but we avoid the single greatest problem: our decisions. The growing track record of failures demonstrates that this “technology-heavy” approach is not working.
The underlying problem with this strategy is that it is simply untenable unless there is some revolutionary technology that completely changes the landscape. And while we do think artificial intelligence and quantum computing will be game-changing, we do not necessarily believe they will solve all our problems. Poor handling and implementation of these two technologies may, in fact, accelerate our demise. Therefore, we cannot continue to throw what limited resources we have at supposed technological wizardry, fixes, and repairs when the root of our deepest problems are inherently insecure systems, poor maintenance, and social engineering. Continue reading “A National Cybersecurity Action Plan is a Serious Priority”
Frank Abagnale, one of the world’s most respected authorities on the subjects of forgery, embezzlement, cybercrime, and secure documents succinctly states the troubling environment. “The police can’t protect consumers. People need to be more aware and educated about identity theft. You need to be a little bit wiser, a little bit smarter and there’s nothing wrong with being skeptical. We live in a time when if you make it easy for someone to steal from you, someone will.” There are many malicious actors out in the digital landscape and it will be increasingly important to stay ever vigilant.
Email interview held on 30th September 2017 – as follows between Alan Radley (questioner) and Chuck Brooks (relator):
- What are your thoughts on the current state of cybersecurity, both for organizations and for consumers?
The current state is a scary one. Constant breaches have demonstrated that as consumers we are becoming more and more dependent upon digital commerce. Our banking accounts, credit cards, and financial daily activities are interconnected. We are all increasingly vulnerable from hackers, phishers, and malware proliferating across all commercial verticals.
In the past year, the employment of ransomware has become a method of cyber-attack choice by hackers. This is because many networks (especially hospitals, utilities, universities, and small businesses) are comprised of different systems, devices and often lack required patching and updating necessary to thwart attacks. The recent Wannacry, and Petya attacks were certainly wake up calls to the disruptive implications of ransomware. We can expect to see more such attacks because of the ease of infection and because the vulnerabilities to networks still remain. Continue reading “Science of Cybersecurity Interview with Chuck Brooks”
The threat which concerns us most is effectively preying on humans, our concern is warranted. And that is why we feel that the biggest problem the power grid faces today is phishing, spear-phishing, and pretexting, all of which we will define in this set of articles.
Do you go fishing? You may or may not, but we see far too much phishing going on in the Internet ocean, and it scares us. The risk of over-phishing is not necessarily our concern. Our concern rests in that phishing is so easy, and big fat phish of this Internet ocean are getting gobbled up. And that’s not good for us because many of us don’t really know what is in the ocean, like critical infrastructure (CI).
As the title suggests, our biggest concern as it relates to ICS/SCADA connected devices is us. We are an incredible vulnerability to CI, and seeing as though everything we depend on runs on some form of CI, its best we protect it.
Let’s start with some basics. Our CI is for the most part old. Devices are stuck with legacy software and cannot be updated or patched because they are simply too old and out-of-date are a potential problem, as these systems have vulnerabilities that hackers can take advantage of. Yes, there is a flip side to the argument here that some of these systems are so old they cannot be hacked or are extremely difficult to be hack, as is the case in the US nuclear system. (But don’t think for a moment that nobody is trying!)
Continue reading “ICS/SCADA Devices, The Threat to Critical Infrastructure, and Social Engineering”
The Non-Technical, No Nonsense Guide For Directors, Officers, and General Counsels
Cybersecurity, as many organizations practice it today, is broken. Everybody is feeling the pressure as competitors and partners alike dread a breach. Leadership can’t be left in the dark due to technobabble, a lack of resources, or excuses as to why cyber risk cannot be measured.
FireEye is proud to support the new eBook, The #CyberAvengers Playbook: Doing the Little Things (and Some of the Big Things) Well (2017 Edition). This short guide is designed to give you actionable items that could help any organization improve its cybersecurity posture.
Download the eBook and pick up the following tips from the #CyberAvengers:
- Oversight duties: Learn to view risk from an enterprise perspective in an era where accountability and fallout costs are surely going to grow.
- Cyber risk: Why it matters and how to wisely spend your limited resources.
- Communication gaps: Cybersecurity is not an IT-only issue, so do not be afraid to speak your mind. We show you which questions to ask.
- Response and continuity: Even the best-tested plans can go out the window during a time of crisis. Learn to minimize the fallout.
- What’s happening in 2017 and what to expect in 2018: From the ransomware scare to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into effect, business is becoming more expensive. We try to help you save wherever you can.
Therefore, if your IT department says to you, “we’re confident we do not have any malware on our network” ask how they came to that conclusion. If instead they say, “we do not have any malware on our network, honest, trust us!” then raise an eyebrow and get your hands dirty, because you have work to do.
The question seems simple enough, doesn’t it? But have you asked the question? My feeling is that not enough people actually do. Of course, a natural response may be: isn’t that a question for my IT department to answer?
Yes and no (more on that in a moment). And I promise I am not trying to play word games, but words and their meanings matter, and am therefore placing particular focus on the word trust. Trust is different than confidence. Trust is different than transparency. Trust has a much more “personal” element than the others. And so much of what we do in the world today is based on trust. Continue reading “Do You Trust Your Network?”
The human-technology cyber conflict cannot be solved, but instead is a fact not to be solved but to be coped with over time.
Previously, I proposed that security and economy are inextricably linked and that such a link has the potential to increase both national and personal prosperity. If you are a student of history, I do not believe you will have any difficulty accepting this hypothesis, particularly when you put aside any consideration of cultural and societal issues or constructs.
A sovereign entity can potentially achieve national prosperity through security and economy, but that construct may not be tenable over time. Therefore, how prosperity is achieved is where it gets tricky. Why? Because people see the world in different ways and people want to live their lives differently. Continue reading “Multilateral Cyber Interests Will Rarely Align”
Set aside all politics and details for a moment and begin with this premise: are my interests being met? If you take that as your starting point, the fog will begin to clear for you. Of course, reasonable people can have an informed debate over what “correct” interests are, but that is what we try to do in democracies. Interest is the overriding factor here.
In my previous article, I discussed the clash of systems we currently are in. Super quick recap: in one corner, we have the Westphalian nation-state system that’s been around since 1648 and is built on the principles of sovereignty, legal equality and a policy of non-interventionism; in the other corner, we have the Internet, which has no established sovereignty, is marred by legal blurring, and by virtue is interventionist and disruptive in nature.
Ultimately, what we have is a system clash where our original intent – free flow of information but with positive control of the Internet in our lives – has been flipped on its head, where the Internet effectively controls our lives. Continue reading “Before You Declare Your Enemy, Be Sure of Your Interests”
I start from this premise: we have finite resources. I do not think anybody serious would disagree with me on this premise. Therefore, let us be smart about how we use these resources. And part of being smart is asking the right questions and knowing the basics.
One undeniable fact: the 2016 elections brought the word “cybersecurity” into the mainstream. The problem that stemmed from that fact: nobody is actually sure what “cybersecurity” is. And as a result, we spin our wheels or head off into differing directions.
For all the tech talk, commentary, and promise of some incredible “save you from all cyber threats” solution, lost in the conversation are the cybersecurity basics. It is a disservice to all when pundits use words, such as hack and leak, interchangeably. Those who have a more informed understanding of the issue know that these terms having incredibly different meaning. The same can be said for words such as stolen and copied. They are not the same and are often confused, even misused. And how about this one: the difference between authorized access by an unauthorized user and unauthorized access. The fine nuance between the two can entirely re-characterize the nature of an attack. Continue reading “Cybersecurity Starts With Basics”