We cannot allow this slow economic bleed of our economy to continue. It slows down and even reverses living standards. We simply cannot invest billions into research and development and have it siphoned from us with a few clicks. There is no justifiable reason to let this happen anymore. Smart and competent people have been sounding the alarm bells for some time, but they need more voices to back them.
Expectedly, our cybersecurity issues are growing. We say expectedly for a variety of factors including, but not limited to: size and scope of breaches, increasing costs that cannot be accurately estimated or predicted, a proliferation of technologies and abilities, and geopolitical tensions. Given current conditions, we do not see a particularly bright future if our current cybersecurity strategy remains more or less constant.
What is our current strategy? In short, it is the accumulation of a lot of expensive toys to hold together decaying infrastructure, along with a healthy dose of the putting aside or worse, ignoring, the basics. In short, we look to more technological solutions, but we avoid the single greatest problem: our decisions. The growing track record of failures demonstrates that this “technology-heavy” approach is not working.
The underlying problem with this strategy is that it is simply untenable unless there is some revolutionary technology that completely changes the landscape. And while we do think artificial intelligence and quantum computing will be game-changing, we do not necessarily believe they will solve all our problems. Poor handling and implementation of these two technologies may, in fact, accelerate our demise. Therefore, we cannot continue to throw what limited resources we have at supposed technological wizardry, fixes, and repairs when the root of our deepest problems are inherently insecure systems, poor maintenance, and social engineering. Continue reading “A National Cybersecurity Action Plan is a Serious Priority”
This plague has only increased and has prompted much research and writing on cybersecurity best practices (including by us) settling on, at the very least, one or more best practices designed to lessen (if not entirely mitigate) the effects of ransomware.
The recent WannaCry ransomware exploit brought into full view several factors that terrify many companies and their boards of directors. Why? Because these directors are charged with the fiduciary duty of overseeing the cyber risk preparations and defences of their companies for their shareholders.
In today’s environment, this presents quite a challenge for companies and boards alike. Security has always been a challenge because the defender must be right 100 per cent of the time and an attacker needs only one lucky shot. Effective cyberattacks can involve factors, such as:
1. A ‘zero-day’ or previously unknown software exploit (or vulnerability) that even advanced IT departments could not have reasonably planned for
2. An exploit that encrypts files when enabled or executed, and will not give the files back unless a ransom is paid
3. A public relations nightmare trying to explain to third parties, regulators (and in the case of WannaCry, hospital patients) why service levels dropped (i.e. evaporated) due to lack of properly segmented back-up recovery media and/or less than rigorous implementation of standard patches for older operating systems. Continue reading “Cybersecurity: A fiduciary duty”
The Non-Technical, No Nonsense Guide For Directors, Officers, and General Counsels
Cybersecurity, as many organizations practice it today, is broken. Everybody is feeling the pressure as competitors and partners alike dread a breach. Leadership can’t be left in the dark due to technobabble, a lack of resources, or excuses as to why cyber risk cannot be measured.
FireEye is proud to support the new eBook, The #CyberAvengers Playbook: Doing the Little Things (and Some of the Big Things) Well (2017 Edition). This short guide is designed to give you actionable items that could help any organization improve its cybersecurity posture.
Download the eBook and pick up the following tips from the #CyberAvengers:
- Oversight duties: Learn to view risk from an enterprise perspective in an era where accountability and fallout costs are surely going to grow.
- Cyber risk: Why it matters and how to wisely spend your limited resources.
- Communication gaps: Cybersecurity is not an IT-only issue, so do not be afraid to speak your mind. We show you which questions to ask.
- Response and continuity: Even the best-tested plans can go out the window during a time of crisis. Learn to minimize the fallout.
- What’s happening in 2017 and what to expect in 2018: From the ransomware scare to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into effect, business is becoming more expensive. We try to help you save wherever you can.
Set aside all politics and details for a moment and begin with this premise: are my interests being met? If you take that as your starting point, the fog will begin to clear for you. Of course, reasonable people can have an informed debate over what “correct” interests are, but that is what we try to do in democracies. Interest is the overriding factor here.
In my previous article, I discussed the clash of systems we currently are in. Super quick recap: in one corner, we have the Westphalian nation-state system that’s been around since 1648 and is built on the principles of sovereignty, legal equality and a policy of non-interventionism; in the other corner, we have the Internet, which has no established sovereignty, is marred by legal blurring, and by virtue is interventionist and disruptive in nature.
Ultimately, what we have is a system clash where our original intent – free flow of information but with positive control of the Internet in our lives – has been flipped on its head, where the Internet effectively controls our lives. Continue reading “Before You Declare Your Enemy, Be Sure of Your Interests”
The #CyberAvengers want to make cybersecurity unintimidating. Isn’t it a liberating feeling to know when your mechanic is running a fast one on you? It is. And you do that because you build up your knowledge and are unafraid to say, “why are you trying to get me replace my entire axle when all I need is a control arm?”
We are pointing out the obvious, but the obvious needs to be pointed out these days: How you view the world impacts your decision-making. And equally as important is how you view yourself. Therefore, if you see the world as a relatively benign place and feel for the most part you are well prepared for whatever challenge you will face, it is quite likely you will do little to change your behavior.
But if you view the world as a more hostile place and think of yourself and us as unprepared, chances are you will either wither away into a corner, frightening yourself into hysterical paranoia, or you will do something rational to prepare yourself for whatever challenge comes your way.
Let us start with this basic premise: The internet is inherently vulnerable. It was designed that way because the debate—about 40 plus years ago—focused on open access and free flow of information versus security. The former won, but we are paying the price today. So, if the information highway (the internet) is all banged up and falling apart, it does not matter how safe your car is because the road is still a mess. Continue reading “Explaining Cybersecurity through Cars: Get Yours Inspected or Get It Off the Road”
These are governance issues at their core, not technological ones, meaning that whatever technological steps you take to protect your data, you still may be overlooking the big picture (which will result in a loss of resources and open you up to liability). And because they are governance issues, there is a heavy dose of “human element” challenges associated to them.
Protecting yourself in cyberspace requires multiple solutions working all together.
Be cautious of the cybersecurity vendor that promises you a technical solution that will solve all of your cybersecurity problems. Life, unfortunately, is not that simple and a one-size-fits-all approach is bound to get you in trouble given today’s cyber complexities. Similarly, simply adopting a solution may not be enough. How you implement that solution could be the difference between operating a safer network or, inadvertently, making your network more vulnerable. One such solution is encryption. Continue reading “When it Comes to Cyber Deterrence, One Size Fits…One”
For all the solutions out there, make sure you are packing the right material for you because you only have a finite amount of resources. This is what it means to be situationally aware. And this exercise also helps you prioritize what data you value most.
In previous articles on understanding big data, the need for AI, using encryption and tokenization (including the drawbacks of encryption), and the series on human vulnerabilities, we laid down just some of the building blocks necessary to create a robust cybersecurity strategy. Yet there is a larger problem we often experience: losing the trees for the forest. All the tips we have mentioned thus far are great, but only if you are situationally aware of your own challenges.
If you have legal or regulatory compliance issues, such as European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), you have no choice but to follow them. However, neither of us are big fans of standards and certifications for the simple reason that they rarely meet your specific needs in addition to being a costly undertaking in both time and money. This is why we are fans of frameworks, such as NIST Cybersecurity Framework (updated in January 2017) for the exact reason that a framework allows you to meet your own needs. Continue reading “Situational Awareness: Beware of Your Cyber Surroundings”
Cryptographic systems that are proprietary (those that have not been publicly tested and scrutinized) may very well meet mathematical robustness. The problem is you have no way of knowing, or testing, whether or not the cryptographic system is actually secure unless you have insider information. Therefore, be cautious if somebody is promising you a pot of gold.
In an article we wrote for Tripwire, we discuss the advantages of encryption and tokenization. The premise of our argument is as follows: slow down your adversary by making your data meaningless to them. In other words, make yourself a “goes nowhere” project forcing your adversary to seek out a target that does not cause them the grief you do.
Encryption works precisely because it slows down an actor but it comes with some bad news, as well. Therefore, we wrote this add-on article to explain some of the drawbacks of encryption. Continue reading “Encryption Works Great, But Only When Done Right”
Would you invest time and treasure in a “goes nowhere” project? Probably not. You have better things to do. Therefore, take steps – like encryption, tokenization, and data masking – to make your data so meaningless to an adversary that they will consider you a “goes nowhere” project.
Before we jump in, we need to make clear the following: no single solution will ever offer complete and total security. In fact, even multiple solutions designed to provide overlapping layers of security to your crown jewels will not provide “complete and total” security. But what any reasonably implemented solution should do is the following: slow down your adversary by making their job difficult and eventually forcing them to move on to a more easily accessible target (or, more colloquially, go for the low hanging fruit).
Although this fact should be relatively obvious, both of us still experience – more often than we would like to admit – “experts” professing they can provide “total security” because they have the latest and greatest technology. As we indicated in our previous article (making sense of big data), big numbers are, in fact, hard to make sense of by mere mortals like us. In the same fashion, humans are really bad at understanding probabilities (for those who seek greater understanding of the topic, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness, explains the subject well). “Low” probability is in fact quite different from “zero” probability, but we often make the mistake of equating the two (and such a mistake could be perilous). Continue reading “Make Yourself a “Goes Nowhere” Project for Adversaries”